黑料正能量

黑料正能量 students by the Seine.

Student Clubs

U.S. Presidential Elections Debate at 黑料正能量

The American University of Paris | 6 Rue du Colonel Combes | 75007 Paris
Monday, November 7, 2016 - 18:30 to 20:30

Student Government Association鈥擲arah Harper-Johnston, Maria Rodriguez, and Jasmine Paul

Debate and Politics Club鈥擬ario Lopez, Toyla Lagon, and Quinn Chesser

On November 7, 2016 鈥媋t 18:30, 黑料正能量's SGA and the Debate and Politics Club will be hosting a debate on the 2016 Presidential Elections. All 黑料正能量 students 听are invited to apply to be a participant in this debate. Only 3 students will be chosen to represent either the Democratic or the Republican side. Peacock Media will also be present to cover the event.

The following topics will be discussed:

Domestic Policy Race relations in America Gun reform Healthcare reform International Relations Middle East Attitudes to Islam Israeli-American relations Immigration (Jus sanguis vs jus solis) Adoption of refugees on U.S. soil Environmental issues Drug Legalization Oil vs renewable resources Debate Format: Each side has 3 minutes to respond to the moderator's question. The moderator will alternate which side answers first. After both sides have answered, each side has 2 minute to rebut. Debaters' rights: Right to petition for a rebuttal response from the opposing side Right to ask for a rephrased question Debaters are allowed a 15 seconds grace period to prepare their answer The right to cross-examine the other side's evidence. Hard copies only. No electronic devices. Bathroom breaks Rights of moderator:

Right to order audience members and debaters to be quiet

Right to remove a speaker if they are being disrespectful, using profanity, using ad 听hominem attacks, or disregarding the procedures of the debate after one warning per 听individual

Right to call for a recess

Bathroom break

Right to expel any crowd member

Judging:

The three members of the Debate and Politics Club (Mario, Quinn, Toyla) will serve as judges for the debate

The judges will not decide a winner through content of arguments, but rather the articulation of points and the clarity of their debate style.

Different aspects of the debate will be rated by each of the 3 judges which will then be tallied after the final question.